If the NWO is notorious for funding both sides of all wars, any form of resistance to them would be funded by them in some form or another.
They create the divisions that precipitate wars, they control public opinions, and then they buy up even greater control by purchasing the spoils of war for pennies on the dollar, euro or any other currency they control.
So let’s think for just a moment…
From this perspective, it would make sense that resistance is exactly what they want (war equals death, death equals depopulation of the masses by the masses, as well as huge profits from and the debt incurred by war… which means less effort on their part, and it meets there agendas as well).
Resistance then is something they are definitely counting on. What if resistance was handled in a way that did more harm to them than good? For example, even during a war the opponents at one point or another eventually have to open diplomatic relations and negotiations to end hostilities. Now what if hostilities never started against the NWO, but instead a campaign of diplomacy from the start that would eventually lead to their admission of guilt and surrender. Diplomatically force them into a corner, not through aggression, but through forcing the truth to the forefront the same way they spread their deceptions – through the media. Always nice when you can use the enemy’s weapons against them. This is something they would most likely not be expecting, a non-combat approach to resistance. A combat approach would mean we have to buy everything from the big businesses (which they control) that produce the instruments of combat and defense.